Posted by SASTA
on 30/03/2026
When people think about Artificial Intelligence (AI), they often imagine robots, self-driving cars, or maybe ChatGPT. But in our lab at the University of Adelaide, AI is helping us look at something much closer to home: children’s faces.
Recently, my team worked on a project to help doctors better understand a condition called Hemifacial Microsomia (HFM). It is a condition where one side of a child’s face doesn’t develop at the same rate as the other. For some children, it is mild; for others, it can significantly affect their jaw, chewing, speaking, and even breathing.
Doctors have been diagnosing and grading the severity of this condition for decades. But here’s the challenge: it isn't always easy. Medical scans are incredibly complex, assessments often depend on a specialist's individual experience, and sometimes, the subtlest differences matter the most.
This is where curiosity stepped in.
What If We Looked at It Differently?
In science, curiosity often begins with a simple, disruptive question: “What are we missing?”
When we looked at 3D scans of children’s jaws, we realised something fascinating. These scans contain a massive amount of data-tens of thousands of tiny points describing the surface of the bone. In the tech world, we call these “Point Clouds.”
But as we stared at these clouds of dots, we wondered: Are all these points actually helping us, or are they just noise?
Think about drawing a mountain. Where do you put the most detail with your pencil? It’s usually along the sharp ridges and the jagged edges, not in the big, flat, smooth areas. We asked ourselves: What if the most important information isn’t everywhere, but only along the edges?
The Power of Asking "Less"
That simple question led to a new way of analysing medical scans. Instead of forcing an AI system to "swallow" every single point in a massive scan, we taught it to be selective. We trained it to focus on the “edges”- the curved boundaries where the jaw bends and shapes itself. These are the areas that tell the true story of how a bone has developed.
And something wonderful happened. When we reduced the data from 20,000 points down to just 2,000 carefully chosen “edge” points, the system didn't just get faster, it became more accurate. By ignoring 90% of the "distraction," the AI could finally see the "truth." That is the power of a curious question: it allows us to stop looking at everything so we can finally see something.
Curiosity Isn’t About "More" - It’s About "Smarter"
This project taught us a lesson that students in any classroom can relate to: More information isn’t always better. Sometimes, a scientific breakthrough comes from learning what to ignore so you can focus on what truly matters.
When Data is Scarce, Creativity Steps In
We hit another hurdle: HFM is a rare condition. We didn’t have the luxury of "Big Data" or thousands of examples to train our AI. So, we asked another curious question: “How can we learn from what we don't have?”
Instead of waiting for more cases, we used a technique similar to mixing paint. If one jaw shape represents a “mild” case and another represents “moderate,” we realised we could "blend" them to create realistic new training samples. By treating data like colours on a palette, we taught the computer to understand the smooth, continuous transitions of human growth.
Science is a Living Process
One of the joys of being a researcher is realising that science is never "finished." It evolves. It improves. It constantly questions its own assumptions.
Medical diagnosis today looks very different from what it did 20 years ago. With AI and 3D modelling, we are discovering entirely new ways to visualise the human body. But the heart of the process remains the same:
Observe -> Question -> Test -> Refine.
That cycle is exactly the same in a primary school classroom experiment as it is in a high-tech university lab. It all begins with the courage to be curious and the willingness to look at a cloud of dots and ask: "Is there a better way to see this?"

Associate Professor Wei Zhang is a researcher at Adelaide University and the Australian Institute for Machine Learning.
She specialises in making AI more trustworthy and efficient. Her recent work on medical imaging was on adapting 3D AI technologies in the medical domain.
In this Section
Archive
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018